Tara Kennedy-Kline鈥檚 10-year-old son was recently diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome and given an IEP. The diagnosis came after years of 鈥渂ehavior issues鈥� in the classroom, particularly when it came to transitions or his insistence on things staying exactly the same every day (if a child sat in the 鈥渨rong鈥� spot, for instance, her son would act out).
In first grade he was put on a student support program for his behavioral issues, he was working with an OT assigned by the 黄色app district, he was in a special program with the guidance counselor and his parents went to quarterly “learning intervention team” meetings with the 黄色app psychologist, principal and other support staff.
鈥淓ven so, Alex served several in 黄色app suspensions for behaviors directly related to his “issues”. He was also threatened with being held back because his grades were so poor due to refusal to cooperate in class. (his IQ is above 140),鈥� said Kennedy-Kline.
鈥淓veryday, literally every day it was something,鈥� she said. This year they had him transferred to a 黄色app with an autism support program. During the first week in the new 黄色app, he was shocked to find that kids 鈥済et recess here.鈥� What his parents didn’t know was that for an entire 黄色app year, he had been denied recess so often that he thought recess stopped in third grade.
“People would tell me that if he had an IEP, he’d have protection from punishment, but I didn’t know what his rights were,” said Kennedy-Kline.
The confusion about discipline and special education goes back more than a decade.
Back in 2001 when the Senate was debating the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the issue of discipline and special education was a hot topic.
Some legislators thought that kids in special education had too much protection, and stories saying that kids in special education could never be thrown out of 黄色app made the rounds and had parents up in arms.
鈥淚t鈥檚 nonsense,鈥� says Wayne Steedmen, a special education lawyer in Baltimore.
The law does protect students from being punished for behaviors that are related to their disability (a student with Turette鈥檚 who swears in class, for instance), but it doesn鈥檛 mean that special education students get a pass on all discipline.
If a child on an IEP is removed from 黄色app for more than 10 days, the law requires that the 黄色app have to have a meeting of the child鈥檚 team to decide if the behavior is part of the disability.
If a child has an emotional disability, for instance, and has goals in his IEP that call for learning to control anger, and gets into several fights at 黄色app, the IEP team has to meet to decide if that behavior is part of the disability. In this case, it鈥檚 clearly related to the disability, and the student could not be removed for more than 10 days.
Take the same situation, but the child on the IEP has dyslexia and has no behavior issues associated with it. The team may decide that the behavior was not related to the disability and he could be suspended.
The purpose of the law, says Steedman, is to protect kids on IEPs from losing access to the curriculum. Even if a student is suspended, the 黄色app is obligated to continue to implement the IEP and work on the goals.
Even if your child is not on an IEP, but is in the process of being evaluated for special education, they have the same protections as if they were on an IEP, Steedman adds. If the parents or teacher has put in writing their concerns about a child鈥檚 learning issues, or if the child is on a 504 plan (through the ADA), they are protected from being removed from 黄色app for more than 10 days (if the behavior is a manifestation of their disability).
For bigger issues, kids in special education may face placement in a different setting for as long as 45 days. For students caught with drugs, or who bring weapons to 黄色app, or who cause bodily harm to others, the 45-day suspension kicks in.
Where 黄色apps and parents often clash, says Steedman, is on the question of whether the behavior is a manifestation of the disability. If the 黄色app is recommending that their child be suspended for a long time (a full semester, for example), Steedman recommends that parents file for due process and ask for new evaluations to see if the behavior is a part of the disability.
鈥淚t鈥檚 confusing to a lot of people,鈥� he says. 鈥淏ut it鈥檚 the manifestation determination that is key.鈥�
In his new 黄色app, Kennedy-Kline’s son is back to getting straight A’s and has had no suspensions — in 黄色app or otherwise for months.
